Re: Intel 82566DC-2 problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



So, the solution to the whole problem ended up being a lot simpler
than I had feared.

Install kernel-devel rpm's from the Fedora DVD.
Sneakernet the e1000 tarball from Intel's website to the destination machine.

# tar zxvf e1000-abc.tar.gz
# cd e1000-abc/src
# make install
# chmod 744 /lib/modules/kernel-xyz/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.ko

The key step, which I didn't know to do the first time, was install
kernel-devel.  I thought I needed to install the kernel-source, and
build the kernel to generate version.h.

So, easily solved once you know the solution.



On 8/30/07, Jim Cornette <fc-cornette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Michael Semcheski wrote:
> >> What is in /etc/modprobe.conf?
> >
> > The modprobe.conf on the computer in question hasn't been altered
> > manually, and looks like modprobe.conf on other Fedora 7 computers I
> > have.
> >
>
> The reason I asked is it seems to contain sound and Ethernet information
> for my computer. Since no Ethernet, something might be missing from the
> file.
>
> Truthfully, I always use neat (System-config-network) to configure the
> devices and do not manually add info to modprobe.conf - Most of the time
> the program finds the device without error.
>
> If I recall discussions from the experts regarding modprobe.conf, it is
> for kernel modules which are contained in the initrd image. You can also
> regenerate the modprobe.conf by deleting some file and getting hardware
> detection to regenerate the modprobe.conf. I did not try this so I only
> know this exists.
>
> >
> >> I have the below in mine for example. You would of course need
> >> parameters specific to your machine.
> Added from previous omission: (forgot to paste it in the message.
>
> cat /etc/modprobe.conf
> alias eth0 natsemi
> alias scsi_hostadapter pata_ali
> alias eth1 airo_cs
> alias snd-card-0 snd-ali5451
> options snd-card-0 index=0
> options snd-ali5451 index=0
>
>
> >>
> >> Bad answer on my part. More curious than knowledgeable with this type of
> >> problem.
> >
> > At this point, everything is helpful.
> >
> > I have 5 workstations, all purchased within three months of each
> > other.  All are the same model and the same specs were used to
> > purchase them.  The 3 older ones have 82566DM as their network
> > (according to lspci).  The 2 newest ones have 82566DC-2 according to
> > lspci.  DM works great, DC-2 not at  all.  And I just can't figure out
> > what to try next.
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
>  From a google search might be helpful.
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-kernel-list/2007-August/msg00094.html
>
> Regarding your module building efforts, I have no idea unless the source
> from the Intel site is older than Fedora uses.
>
> Jim
>
> --
> When you're dining out and you suspect something's wrong, you're
> probably right.
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux