Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:21:37 +0100
Cc:
In-reply-to: <46D75B1E.1090700@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903
References: <cdc5a80c7887.7887cdc5a80c@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <46D6EB55.2060901@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20070831004453.04b7df1d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46D75B1E.1090700@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

> Care to elaborate on that last statement?  Are you talking about the disks
> themselves or the IDE interface or ????  If "IDE" disks are unreliable then
> what disks are reliable?

The disks themselves. I've yet to meet a reliable disk, ever year or two
one dies on me.

Alan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
  - From: Tim
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
  - From: Rick Stevens

References:
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
  - From: ke5c
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
  - From: Andy Green
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
  - From: Alan Cox
- Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
  - From: Ed Greshko

Prev by Date: Re: LABEL's
Next by Date: Re: DD not working
Previous by thread: Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
Next by thread: Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]