Re: the clock stopped in F7 ?!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Tim wrote:

Tim:
I don't have the original poster's problem, but I tried that command to
see what happens.  The same results, each time:

[root@bigblack ~]# cat /proc/interrupts | grep timer
 0:        180   IO-APIC-edge      timer

Mike:
Weird.  I wonder if there is another interrupt used to 'bump' the clock?
Just for grins try it w/o the grep.  There should be a list of a dozen or
so interrupts.  See if the line associated with rtc is 'racing'.  Or
maybe there's yet another interrupt used (other than ethX, ideX etc.).

[root@bigblack ~]# cat /proc/interrupts
          CPU0
 0:        179   IO-APIC-edge      timer
 1:          2   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
 6:          5   IO-APIC-edge      floppy
 7:          0   IO-APIC-edge      parport0
 8:          0   IO-APIC-edge      rtc0
10:          0   IO-APIC-edge      MPU401 UART
12:          4   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
14:      13217   IO-APIC-edge      libata
15:       1842   IO-APIC-edge      libata
16:       3454   IO-APIC-fasteoi   ohci_hcd:usb1, ohci_hcd:usb2
17:        502   IO-APIC-fasteoi   SiS SI7012, eth0
18:      17782   IO-APIC-fasteoi   nvidia
20:          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
NMI:          0
LOC:      93114
ERR:          0
MIS:          0

I've rebooted since the last test, which probably accounts for the 179
where I previously had 180.  But I get unchanging results, again.  Each
iteration of the command produces the same results.


So I guess I can write that off as a troubleshooting technique in newer kernels. One more thing out of curiosity if you get a chance, does the timestamp value in 'cat /proc/schedstat' change on subsequent views?

-- Mike


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux