Re: Xen, QEMU/KVM or Vmware ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Xen, QEMU/KVM or Vmware ?
From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 02:00:54 +0530
In-reply-to: <ae39960b0708221320r508a7651h3e566da2ff785dae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat
References: <ae39960b0708221238j4f7b5c12p2d79c621952e32d7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46CC985C.4070903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ae39960b0708221320r508a7651h3e566da2ff785dae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727)

John Lagrue wrote:


virt-manager works after a fashion, but gives errors galore, crashes
and a generated guest won't even boot off a valid .ISO file that
qemu-kvm had no trouble with. Even after using qemu-kvm to install the

guest, virt-manager still won't work properly.

Works fine for me. You can report any issues to fedora-xen list orbugzilla. This discussion is better suited for that list anyway.


Rahul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Xen, QEMU/KVM or Vmware ?
  - From: John Lagrue

References:
- Xen, QEMU/KVM or Vmware ?
  - From: John Lagrue
- Re: Xen, QEMU/KVM or Vmware ?
  - From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Xen, QEMU/KVM or Vmware ?
  - From: John Lagrue

Prev by Date: Re: Xen, QEMU/KVM or Vmware ?
Next by Date: Re: Xen, QEMU/KVM or Vmware ?
Previous by thread: Re: Xen, QEMU/KVM or Vmware ?
Next by thread: Re: Xen, QEMU/KVM or Vmware ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]