Re: F7 nvidia-96xx driver problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ed Greshko writes:

Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Ed Greshko writes:

Sam Varshavchik wrote:

Then there is nothing measure against...so everything is irrelevant.

The fact that there aren't anywhere the same number of complaints, about
the free drivers, is irrelevant?

Yes.  Especially when you consider the vast differences in functionality.
It becomes an apple to oranges comparison.

The fact that there aren't any complaints does not mean that nobody's
using them. That's absurd.

Did I say that?  I think not.  Kindly don't put words in my mouth.  Only my
wife is allowed to do that.

You can certainly said that, with your apples/oranges comparisons, which implied that nobody's using "nv" due to its supposedly limited functionality. That's wrong.

Furthermore, if you think that every Linux
user requires 1,000 FPS in Quake, and thus cannot function without
Nvidia's blob, is, I think, is rather an extreme belief. I somehow
manage to do it. I'm sure many others can too.

What is Quake?  Around here in Taiwan it is when the earth moves and
buildings shake.

You know very well what Quake is, and what is meant by that. You're just putting on a show.


Attachment: pgps5qJwXBWfe.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux