Re: Problem with faad2 with F7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17/07/07, Chris Jones <jonesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm not done it myself, but maybe yum-priorities can do the tricks to
> avoid conflicts from different repo ;-)

Yes, it can. I'll doing this myself at the moment on my Fedora7 box.

I have a fair number of external repos enabled (livna, freshrpms, atrpms,
adobe-linux) However, I have only given livna, my 'primary' external repo,
the same priority as the main fedora ones. This means this repo is favored
over the others if a package is available from there (even if the others
have 'newer' ones). I can then use freshrpms and atrpms for the odd few rpms
livna doesn't provide (openafs for intance from atrpms).

Works very nicely once you have it set up. However, if you are currently in a
dependency mess, you will need to clean that up first by hand before this
using approach - Its no magic 'cleanup' bullet...

Chris

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


The thing that I don't understand is why is livna's faad2 package has
release 2.0 ( dated Oct 2006 ), while faad2 package from freshrpm is
2.5 ?

If I remove faad-2.5 from freshrpm to install faad-2.0 from livna, I
may break other apps that depend on faad-2.5.

John


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux