David Boles: >>> There is a better chance of me being 'me' than there is of you being >>> 'you'. ;-) Tim: >> Only on a personal verification level. ;-) David Boles: > Really? In that *you* know that you are you. > I sign my emails with a verifiable signature. You sign yours with > what? But verifiable against what? gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) gpg: Signature made Fri 13 Jul 2007 14:04:22 CST using DSA key ID 8D57E101 gpg: using PGP trust model gpg: Good signature from "David Boles <dgboles@xxxxxxxxx>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 6947 D60B 79D9 059E 405F 4084 00ED 3034 8D57 E101 gpg: textmode signature, digest algorithm SHA1 NB: I am playing devil's advocate, here. I hope that's obvious. I have looked very closely at the model that PGP uses over the years. This "he says he is who claims to be" / "trust me" issue is a core problem. -- [tim@bigblack ~]$ rm -rfd /*^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Huname -ipr 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 i686 i386 Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5. Today, it's FC7. Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
