Don Russell kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika keskiviikko, 11.
heinäkuuta 2007):
> What would it take to have this package actually be called
> vim-enhanced in the update notice?
The package name in the notice is the name of the _source_ RPM.
Vim-enhanced and vim-minimal are both built from the same source
package. Would you want redundant notices for all binary
packages built from the same updated src.rpm?
> Or, perhaps to be more robust, if I get a "package not
> installed", I should dig deeper before deciding it doesn't
> aply and do a"what provides..." then check THAT result.
You could query the %{SOURCERPM} tag of the installed packages,
strip the version info and compare the source names.
--
Markku Kolkka
markku.kolkka@xxxxxx
