Re: fc7 should be f7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: fc7 should be f7
From: Robin Laing <Robin.Laing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:06:12 -0600
In-reply-to: <1184025742.2968.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Defence R&D Canada - Suffield
References: <4692584F.2080602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070709160114.GE12882@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6.2.1.2.2.20070709131242.04c7db90@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1184025742.2968.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Robin.Laing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070414)

In a previous post someone mentioned that FC7 could stand for FedoraComplete 7. I have thought about this and think it isn't such a badidea in the first place. The "Complete" could refer to how manyapplications are included in the basic package in comparison to othertypes of OS's being sold.


Just an idea.

Fedora Complete, the complete OS for server, development or desktop.


--
Due to the move to Exchange Server,
   anything that is a priority, please phone.
Robin Laing

References:
- fc7 should be f7
  - From: Martin Marques
- Re: fc7 should be f7
  - From: Todd Zullinger
- Re: fc7 should be f7
  - From: Eric
- Re: fc7 should be f7
  - From: Tim

Prev by Date: Re: How Do I Switch to KDE from Gnome with Fedora 7?
Next by Date: Minimal Boot Media?
Previous by thread: Re: fc7 should be f7
Next by thread: Re: fc7 should be f7
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]