Re: fc7 should be f7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: fc7 should be f7
From: Eric <spamsink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:14:54 -0400
In-reply-to: <20070709160114.GE12882@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4692584F.2080602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070709160114.GE12882@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>


Martin Marques wrote:

<MM>>>>> Hasn't anybody noticed that packages are still labeled fc7, eventhough it's Fedora 7 and not Fedora Core 7?<<<<<


Good morning, Martin.

I think that the Fedora team tried to convince people to use F7 and not FC7and, since that attempt seems to have failed, came up with a "backronym" of"Fedora Collection" to fit the FC.


Eric

Follow-Ups:
- Re: fc7 should be f7
  - From: Tim
- Re: fc7 should be f7
  - From: Rahul Sundaram

References:
- fc7 should be f7
  - From: Martin Marques
- Re: fc7 should be f7
  - From: Todd Zullinger

Prev by Date: Re: Problems with WPA2/AES and Broadcom BCM4318 (AirForce One 54g)
Next by Date: Re: fc7 should be f7
Previous by thread: Re: fc7 should be f7
Next by thread: Re: fc7 should be f7
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]