On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:17:40 -0500 Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, they do. Because currently the onus is still on the > side of proponents of SELinux to show that it is conclusively > better than what already exists. No, no, no, it isn't about the technology :-). The true value of selinux will appear when redhat pays off enough Sarbanes-Oxley consultants to get the SOX community to declare all computers must run a security system which may not need to actually be selinux, but merely has to meet requirements which are cut & pasted from the selinux spec. Then selinux becomes a mint for printing money :-).
