Re: selinux eradicator?

[Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

David Boles wrote:
> on 6/28/2007 6:16 PM, Mike McCarty wrote:
>
> > David Boles wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >
> > > You want to disable it for yourself? Sure. Help yourself Do that. But to
> > > suggest that everyone do that because you find it a PITA is wrong. IMHO.
> >
> > I didn't see anyone advocate what you argue against. I saw some advocate
> > not to be forced to install it when they don't want it, in order to use
> > FC.
> >
> > Mike
>
>
> The main 'piece' that you don't want, as I understand it which is not that

The fellow who doesn't want SELinux on his machine is Karl, not me.

> well BTW, is in the kernel. The 'major' parts, SELinux, that you speak of
> can be disabled. Like turning off a light. The 'massive rpm downloads' you
> refer to do not exist but can be avoided but excluding them from updates.

I did not refer to any "massive rpm downloads" in any of my messages.

> Next rant?  ;-)

Check to whom you speak. Nothing you wrote seems to apply to me.

SELinux is already inactive on my machine. The daemon isn't even
running.

Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!