Andrew Kelly wrote: > On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 09:55 +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: >> Ter, 2007-06-19 às 00:27 +0100, Alan Cox escreveu: >>> Part of the answer is to take evolution, throw it away. >> I agree with this BUT... >> >>> There are >>> multiple good mail clients for Linux and evolution. Yes evolution looks >>> like microsoft outlook, >> Most multiple good mail clients are just that: mail clients. >> >> Evolution doesn't just look like Microsoft Outlook, it provides some >> quite useful features if you work in a Microsoft dominated corporate >> network, even without using the brain-dead connector. >> >> >> > > <snip> > > Are there other MUAs that one can run in Linux that can connect to an > Exchange server, other that Evolution? I also am marooned in an MS dominated > LAN with the need to access corporate mail. I also use Evolution, as much as > I would prefer something quicker and more reliable (and for God's sake, more > capable of sensible exportation). But what are the alternative? > > Andy > We use Exchange here, and most everyone uses Exchange for us geeks who use Linux with Thunderbird and IMAPS on the server. It's been rock solid for the 2 years we've had it in place. -- Da mihi sis bubulae frustrum assae, solana tuberosa in modo gallico fricta, ac quassum lactatum coagulatum crassum Mark Haney Sr. Systems Administrator ERC Broadband (828) 350-2415 Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support
