On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 00:08 -0700, jdow wrote:
> Chu - directing that at greshko might have been more appropriate.
> "Ed" was most impolite for no good reason. "Scroom and the horse
> he rode in on," would be a suitable reply for Ed's behavior.
>
> {^_^}
Comparatively, gasjr4wd@xxxxxxx 's retort aims explicitly to insult and
shows no appropriateness being a new member to a public forum. The OP's
first post was also aimed at drawing fire with some silly caustic
remarks.
Spam is a fact of life, especially in a mailing list, hiding the online
archive's email or not is not going to deter email harvesting in such a
large list, where users are highly fitting of certain profile. A spammer
simply needs to subscribe, wait a few days to collect hundreds of
profiled email addresses.
> >> Hey Ed,
> >> First, I don't use MS for much, one out of 15 'puters we have are
> >> MS. All others are apple OSX (main boxes), apple os9, opensuse 10.*,
> >> freenas, and a few other Linux flavors along with a few bsd test boxes.
> >> (like, my email domain didn't tell you?!)
> >>
> >> I've been on many, many other lists and the host company keeps the
> >> addresses hidden. Why can't redhat do the same?
> >> Go to the suse or apple archives (or other linux flavors) and you
> >> can't see email addresses, so no email addresses get harvested.
> >> I'm one at least 8 other lists, this list is the most... open(?), by
> >> far. But on my part, my bad. I shouldn't have assumed...
> >>
> >> As for your attitude, Yes, it was a bad idea to use a normal address
> >> for a list that has such an ass like you on it.
> >> What is wrong, can't you figure out how to make simple html links
> >> correctly in your own website?
> >> http://www.greshko.com/
> >>
> >> ... never mind, forget it.
> >>
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> G.
> >>
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
