Re: totem <-> totem-xine

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: totem <-> totem-xine
• From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:00:43 +0000 (UTC)
• References: <07061622001625_24C01178@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200706161649.16394.lightsolphoenix@xxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)

Kelly <lightsolphoenix <at> gmail.com> writes:
> No, totem-xine should have Provides: totem.

Wouldn't the packages then "upgrade" each other, leading exactly to the mess 
the name change was designed to avoid?

        Kevin Kofler

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: totem <-> totem-xine
    • From: Kelly

• References:
  • totem <-> totem-xine
    • From: Jacob (=Jouk) Jansen
  • Re: totem <-> totem-xine
    • From: Kelly

• Prev by Date: vga=ask etc
• Next by Date: Re: Microsoft closes another deal, is redhat next?
• Previous by thread: Re: totem <-> totem-xine
• Next by thread: Re: totem <-> totem-xine
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread