Re: totem <-> totem-xine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: totem <-> totem-xine
From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:00:43 +0000 (UTC)
References: <07061622001625_24C01178@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200706161649.16394.lightsolphoenix@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)

Kelly <lightsolphoenix <at> gmail.com> writes:
> No, totem-xine should have Provides: totem.

Wouldn't the packages then "upgrade" each other, leading exactly to the mess 
the name change was designed to avoid?

        Kevin Kofler

Follow-Ups:
- Re: totem <-> totem-xine
  - From: Kelly

References:
- totem <-> totem-xine
  - From: Jacob (=Jouk) Jansen
- Re: totem <-> totem-xine
  - From: Kelly

Prev by Date: vga=ask etc
Next by Date: Re: Microsoft closes another deal, is redhat next?
Previous by thread: Re: totem <-> totem-xine
Next by thread: Re: totem <-> totem-xine
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux