Re: Do you use SELinux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/7/07, a bc <visual00@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
how many of you activate selinux in fedora here? i know it will be more
security for the computer.

I do, because I'm paranoid, and it's not _that_ intrusive. It's even
got much more friendly in FC7. Example:

Jun  6 01:50:12 localhost kernel: alisp[18003]: segfault at 0000000000000000 rip
000000356866d631 rsp 00007fffe4e2f750 error 6
Jun  6 01:50:14 localhost setroubleshoot:      SELinux is preventing /usr/local/
acl81b.64/alisp from loading /usr/local/acl81b.64/libacli81b21.so which requires
text relocation.      For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 170863e2-f4
1d-4d78-b57d-7d4a9a1872fa

I do as I'm told, and get and explanation and instructions to let me carry on:

Summary
   SELinux is preventing /usr/local/acl81b.64/alisp from loading
   /usr/local/acl81b.64/libacli81b21.so which requires text relocation.

Detailed Description
   The /usr/local/acl81b.64/alisp application attempted to load
   /usr/local/acl81b.64/libacli81b21.so which requires text relocation.  This
   is a potential security problem. Most libraries do not need this permission.
   Libraries are sometimes coded incorrectly and request this permission.  The
   http://people.redhat.com/drepper/selinux-mem.html web page explains how to
   remove this requirement.  You can configure SELinux temporarily to allow
   /usr/local/acl81b.64/libacli81b21.so to use relocation as a workaround,
   until the library is fixed. Please file a
   http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi against this package.

Allowing Access
   If you trust /usr/local/acl81b.64/libacli81b21.so to run correctly, you can
   change the file context to textrel_shlib_t. "chcon -t textrel_shlib_t
   /usr/local/acl81b.64/libacli81b21.so"

   The following command will allow this access:
   chcon -t textrel_shlib_t /usr/local/acl81b.64/libacli81b21.so

etc.

is it useful on a desktop computer? why does fedora 7 activate it as
default?

I'm much more worried about Fedora activating rpc, nfs, sendmail &al by default.

Andras


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux