On Wednesday 06 June 2007 11:51:50 pm Ed Greshko wrote: > > sign using DK as well as DKIM - which you probably dont. > > Ahhh, now the statement makes sense. > > I've read rfc4871 and the historical rfc4870. Picking similar names caused > the confusion on my part. > > Thanks for pointing it out. > It is connfusing for me too ... I have the milter working - it was pretty simple to set up - check the mail headers you will (should) see the signatures in this message too - if you added verify to your sendmail they would be verified too.
