> On Wednesday 06 June 2007 11:21:39 pm Ed Greshko wrote: >> Mail List wrote:uff. >> >> So, what good is dk without the ability to sign outgoing mails? >> > > > Ahh ... there are 2 standards - DK and DKIM - both sign and verify. DK was > the original - it evolved into DKIM. DKIM is the new one - it signs and > verifies. The comment refers only to whether you additionally want to sign > using DK as well as DKIM - which you probably dont. Ahhh, now the statement makes sense. > Well - I really mean above is that there is 1 standard DKIM - DK was the > original yahoo proposal - after discussion and involvement of other players > than yahoo it evolved into an RFC - DKIM. I've read rfc4871 and the historical rfc4870. Picking similar names caused the confusion on my part. Thanks for pointing it out. Ed -- In a great romance, each person basically plays a part that the other really likes. -- Elizabeth Ashley
