On 6/6/07, Manuel Arostegui Ramirez <manuel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 13:16:34 Andy Green wrote: > > Yep no doubt. But what does it mean? It's now a reasonable duty > expected of the company to read all the employee traffic and you are > negligent if you're not doing it? Don't worry it's just a rhetorical > question. > Nope, from my point of view. As I said in a previus email, it's worthless to keep an eye on all the traffic from the employees to the Internet. It's much better to set up some filters such as proxys or firewall rules, bye bye to the conflictive traffic, like p2p, IM... The same with the proxy and websites Much more practical, IMHO Cheers Manuel -- Manuel Arostegui Ramirez. Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
I'd agree this that, to manage / monitor all the data flows, of non buisness critical traffic is a waist of time, rather just put a block all, traffic and allow only buisness critical traffic, eg then use proxy applications with filtering to narrow down the users access further.. -- Gregory Machin gregory.machin@xxxxxxxxx www.linuxpro.co.za
