On Tuesday 05 June 2007 22:23, Dan McCullough wrote: 2nd reply > One other thing, in the states if you as a company are actively > monitoring/tracking email, im and internet usage and an employee does > something illegal, you the company could be held liable as well so I > would also make sure that you know all the laws concerning monitoring. > My reply This makes for a real hornet's nest of problems then. If I understand you correctly. You, and the company monitor your employees. If one of your employees sends for example, a racist email, and you've seen it, and not notified the authorities, you, and the company then become responsible also, as it it were a partner in crime. How does that go if you arn't monitoring your employees Internet activity? Are you/the company still responsible legally for what your employees do on their machines while at work? Nigel. 1st reply > On 6/5/07, Nigel Henry <cave.dnb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tuesday 05 June 2007 19:57, Manuel Arostegui Ramirez wrote: > > > El Martes, 5 de Junio de 2007 19:45, Frank Cox escribió: > > > > On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:25:58 +0200 > > > > > > > > I assume this is to prevent anyone from saying, "But I told you on > > > > MSN that I wanted you to sell that stock yesterday" after the bottom > > > > falls out. > > > > > > If that's true, why not only keeping a log of the company instant > > > messaging system? (If available) > > > > > > The point was, I'd like to know if he's going to inform his users about > > > all this stuff > > > -- > > > Manuel Arostegui Ramirez. > > > > I may be wrong. but seem to remember that Yogesh asked about setting up > > an Internet café a while back. If that's so, perhaps he just wants to > > make sure his clients arn't accessing dodgy sites, etc. > > > > I have no idea as to how responsible an owner of an Internet café would > > be if some of his clients were accessing seriously dodgy porn sites. And > > I mean the worst kind, or were older people carrying on dirty talk with > > young people by means of IM. > > > > Under such circumstances I can well understand the need to know what your > > clients are doing on machines that on the bottom line, you are > > responsible for. > > > > As you say Manuel his clients/employees would need to be very well aware > > that their Internet activity was being monitored, and that they the > > client/employee would ultimately be responsible for what they did on the > > Internet. > > > > Not so easy to track down someone who wanders into an Internet café off > > the street though. They come in, in anonimity, do what they want on your > > machine, and go out in anonimity. > > > > I only mention this, as I'd thought about setting up an Internet café, > > but now think that it's not worth the hassle if you are responsible for > > what your clients do on your machines while online. > > > > Nigel. > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list