Re: Printer lockup (FC4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 11 May 2007, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 23:26 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 May 2007, Warren Sturm wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 18:53 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 10 May 2007, Les wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 16:13 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday 10 May 2007, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 10:11 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Wednesday 09 May 2007, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 20:45 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I sent a large print job to my file/print server, but
> > > > > > > > > > unfortunately I had a paper jam after page 1.  Since then
> > > > > > > > > > I have not been able to print anything to that printer. 
> > > > > > > > > > The localhost:631 interface shows the printer as stopped,
> > > > > > > > > > but I am not allowed to re-start it, despite the fact
> > > > > > > > > > that I entered root's password.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Is there any way out of this, or will I have to remove
> > > > > > > > > > the printer and re-install it?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Anne
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Have you tried lprm to remove the print file from the
> > > > > > > > > printer's queue?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'd removed the print job,  no problem with that, but the
> > > > > > > > printer remains 'stopped' and cannot be re-started, because
> > > > > > > > root doesn't have the permission to do that!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here is an abstract from the man lpadmin page. Maybe that info
> > > > > > > is relevant to your problem.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  -E
> > > > > > >             Enables the printer and accepts jobs; this is the
> > > > > > > same as running
> > > > > > >             the accept(8) or cupsaccept(8) and enable(8) or
> > > > > > > cupsenable(8) programs on the printer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, working as root, on the server:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > lpadmin [ -E ] [ -h server ] -p printer option(s)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > lpadmin -E -p Photo
> > > > > > lpadmin: Unable to connect to server: Bad file descriptor
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and trying it on the local box:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > lpadmin -E -h borg.lydgate.lan -p Photo
> > > > > > lpadmin: Unable to connect to server: Bad file descriptor
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ideas?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anne
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, Anne,
> > > > >     This happened to me after an update.  I had to delete and
> > > > > recreate the printer to get it working again, and even then I had
> > > > > to reboot to make it start working...
> > > > >
> > > > >     Who knows.  I got no useful messages from the logs other that
> > > > > messages about the bad file descriptor like you have here.  I
> > > > > suspect that a change in CUPS
> > > > > forced a modification to the file descriptor that CUPS uses to
> > > > > identify the printer, but the update never updated the description
> > > > > file. Deleting and recreating the printer entry did.
> > > > >
> > > > >     I don't even know where the printer descriptions are held, and
> > > > > never thought to look.
> > > >
> > > > I don't think I can blame an update this time.  For one thing, the
> > > > printer is on an FC4 box, so cups hasn't been updated for a long
> > > > time. For another, I had actually completed the first page of the
> > > > print when the paper-jam caused the problem.
> > > >
> > > > I'm reluctant to do the re-install of the printer, just because I
> > > > hate being beaten :-) but I may have to.  It worked last time I got
> > > > into this sort of mess.
> > > >
> > > > Anne
> > >
> > > 	Have you tried (as root shell) cupsenable ?
> >
> > Bingo!  I hadn't come across that one before, but it appears to have
> > worked. Thanks
>
> That is because there are 2 -E options in lpadmin and you used the wrong
> one. That is crazy but true. The one you used causes encryption.

How crazy can you get?

> You command should have been:
> lpadmin -p Photo -E
> which equivalent to cpsenable.
>
It doesn't seem to have done any harm, presumably because it wasn't enabled 
anyway :-)  The cupsenable command has fixed it though.  I didn't have time 
to check the print last night, but it's fine this morning.

Thanks for the info.  Filed for future reference :-)

Anne

Attachment: pgpwNSA0aD8Gt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux