On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 15:15 -0700, Richard England wrote: > I generally use the Mozilla HTML editor to rough out a page and then > use vim (vi). Have you looked at NVU? How do you think it compares > with the other HTML editors that you mentioned. I've not tried it for ages. I didn't like either of them, back then, but things may have improved. In general, I rarely use HTML editors, I usually use gvim. I've yet to come across one that does the job properly *and* easily. You get fewer nasty surprises when you don't use an editor. One thing I do use is HTML tidy. I can rough out a page in vi, where I've done little more than write in a title, headings, and paragraphs, and get it to neaten all that up into something that's proper. I stuck to vi because it's on just about everything, and works in GUI or text environments. Generally, if I try to fire it up when I don't have X available (e.g. I've ssh'd to a box, and didn't do anything about X), I'll get the text-only version, without having to re-issue any commands. -- (This box runs FC6, my others run FC4 & FC5, in case that's important to the thread.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
