On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 07:39:05PM +0100, Chris Jones wrote: > > > But allow me to post a warning: Once a package you use from ATrpms > > requires another (sub)package as found in ATrpms, but is shadowed by > > livna, or a package in freshrpms requires another (sub)package from > > freshrpms which is now shadowed by ATrpms and livna, or a package from > > dries <and so on>, then you get peculiar bugs that are specific to how > > you setup your system and the priorities, e.g. it is not even > > reproducable by other users that use the same repos. > > > > The repo maintainers may have tried to provide sane packages > > compatible with the other repos, but the priorities revert this work. > > > > This is called selective/partial enabling of a repo and no repo will > > support any issues that may yield out of this. Because, as said, the > > resulting bugs are of a rather per host nature. > > Thanks for the warning. taken on board. > > I *think* the only problem I had was with ffmpeg. There seems to be a > definitive difference in how this is packaged between livna and atrpms that > leads to conflicts. If this could be fixed I would be happy to try again > without priorities. It won't get fixed it neither party has a detailed bugreport :) But please, not on this list, use bugzilla.atrpms.net and/or bugzilla.livna.net. Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpeVzTZ8PZLj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
