On 4/18/07, Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 20:04 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote: > Who decided to give video ogg vorbis filenames same extension as > audio ogg vorbis files? That feels totally wrong to me. That will > confuse a lot of people. And (confuse) applications. I think it's a bad idea, too. There's a lot of things which go by the name alone, and that makes it harder to do two different actions for what seems like the same file type. My system was set up to use XMMS to play ogg files, but it only handles audio (with the set up that I have for it). I had to manually change the open-with options for ogg video to be something else. And it's a fair bet that at some stage it'll open the ogg-audio files, instead of my preferred XMMS application, and I'll have to do more fiddling.
happens to me too ... if i put xmms to open ogg files by default, it'll also try to open ogg video .. etc ... and bash scripting to distinguish between the format that have audio only and audio+video was found to be not easy i wonder what happened to the .ogm extension ..
-- (This box runs FC6, my others run FC4 & FC5, in case that's important to the thread.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-- ----------------------------------------------- regards Hikaru ----------------------------------------------- Mohd Izhar Firdaus Bin Ismail Amano Hikaru 天野晃 「あまの ひかる」 Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS ICT 2nd Year 1st Semester mohd.izhar.firdaus@xxxxxxxxx ----------------------------------------------- kagesenshi.87@xxxxxxxxx Blog: http://kagesenshi.blogspot.com -----------------------------------------------
