Hi, I was wondering if anyone out there had gotten sound to work on this motherboard or the DG965WH in FC6 (or 7 test). I've been working on it for a week now and have had no luck. Thanks! --- fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, > visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body > 'help' to > fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it > is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. CIFS mounting (Ashley M. Kirchner) > 2. Desktop Effects (Derek Tracy) > 3. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Res) > 4. Re: Dovecot Assertion on mail server with POP3 > and LDAP > authentication (Jim Hayward) > 5. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Ed > Greshko) > 6. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Matthew > Miller) > 7. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Res) > 8. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > (linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx) > 9. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Ed > Greshko) > 10. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Ed > Greshko) > 11. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Res) > 12. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Arthur > Pemberton) > 13. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Arthur > Pemberton) > 14. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > (linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx) > 15. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Ed > Greshko) > 16. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Peter > Gordon) > 17. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Peter > Gordon) > 18. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > (linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:12:15 -0600 > From: "Ashley M. Kirchner" <ashley@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: CIFS mounting > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <461AF27F.8070103@xxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; > format=flowed > > > Hi gang, > > I need to auto-mount three CIFS and I'm not sure > how to get that > done with passwords and all. Right now, manually I > do: > > mount -t cifs //server1/OData > /mnt/server1/OData \ > -o user=username,passwd=userpasswd > > How does that get done with fstab? Or am I > better off sticking it > in local.rc? > > -- > H | It's not a bug - it's an undocumented feature. > > +-------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:ashley@xxxxxxxxxx> . > 303.442.6410 x130 > IT Director / SysAdmin / Websmith . > 800.441.3873 x130 > Photo Craft Imaging . > 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6 > http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . > Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 22:13:22 -0400 > From: "Derek Tracy" <tracyde@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Desktop Effects > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: > > <9999810b0704091913j24568755t56e521da36b9a91b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; > format=flowed > > I finally got the proprietary Nvidia Drivers to work > (had to recompile > the drivers from src) with rawhide, but when I went > to enable the > Desktop Effects it bombs out on me. My question is > where is the log > file that I can find the reason it is dying? > > > > -- R/S > --------------------------------- > Derek Tracy > tracyde@xxxxxxxxx > --------------------------------- > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:18:30 +1000 (EST) > From: "Res" <res@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: > > <34624.192.168.0.150.1176171510.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > > On Tue, April 10, 2007 11:05 am, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:46:25PM -0400, > linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx > > wrote: > >> No it has something to do with the function not > being open > >> source or something like that. It was on another > mailing > > > > That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally > include". > > > > > > BS, if the code producers have a complete package > and fedora decide they > dont want to or cant for their own internal policy > reasons include a part > of it, thats STRIPPED, it is STRIPPED code that IS > in the > correct/real/publicly available TRUE source and > binaries released by the > code producers. > > > > > -- > > Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx > <http://mattdm.org/> > > Boston University Linux ------> > <http://linux.bu.edu/> > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > -- > Regards, > Res > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:23:22 -0700 > From: Jim Hayward <jimhayward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Dovecot Assertion on mail server with > POP3 and LDAP > authentication > To: talberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <1176171802.3400.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 13:03 -0700, Tim Alberts > wrote: > > > > > > Checking through the server maillog, I see the > following entry: > > > > > > Apr 4 08:44:38 msi2 dovecot: auth(default): > dovecot-auth: > > > ../../../libraries/liblber/io.c:491: > ber_get_next: Assertion > > > `ber->ber_buf == ((void *)0)' failed. > > > Apr 4 08:44:38 msi2 dovecot: auth(default): > > > pam(secretuser,192.168.0.200): Child process > died > > > Apr 4 08:44:38 msi2 dovecot: auth(default): > PAM: Child 14564 died > > > with signal 6 > > > Apr 4 08:44:38 msi2 dovecot: pop3-login: > Aborted login: > > > user=<secretuser>, method=PLAIN, > rip=192.168.0.200, lip=192.168.0.11 > > > > > I have not seen this error, but since the updates a > couple days ago, > Dovecot keeps dying. I've had to restart it several > times the last few > days. I'm using imap only with dovecot. The only > thing I can find in the > logs... > > Apr 8 16:19:04 penguin dovecot: Time just moved > backwards by 205 > seconds. This might cause a lot of problems, so I'll > just kill myself > now. > > > Regards, > Jim H > -- > Jim Hayward <jimhayward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > GPG Key available at: http://keyserver.noreply.org > gpg --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.noreply.org > 0x85A92DCC > GPG Fingerprint: 1AA9 AEC9 BFDF FF7A E4F8 90C7 4947 > 3A41 85A9 2DCC > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part > Url : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20070409/29ed3a85/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:30:24 +0800 > From: Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <461AF6C0.4040200@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Res wrote: > > On Tue, April 10, 2007 11:05 am, Matthew Miller > wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:46:25PM -0400, > linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx > >> wrote: > >>> No it has something to do with the function not > being open > >>> source or something like that. It was on another > mailing > >> That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally > include". > >> > >> > > > > BS, if the code producers have a complete package > and fedora decide they > > dont want to or cant for their own internal policy > reasons include a part > > of it, thats STRIPPED, it is STRIPPED code that IS > in the > > correct/real/publicly available TRUE source and > binaries released by the > > code producers. > > Can you point us to the srpm available on > openoffice.org website? > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 22:41:36 -0400 > From: Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20070410024136.GA10620@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:18:30PM +1000, Res wrote: > > > That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally > include". > > BS, if the code producers have a complete package > and fedora decide they > > dont want to or cant for their own internal policy > reasons include a part > > of it, thats STRIPPED, it is STRIPPED code that IS > in the > > correct/real/publicly available TRUE source and > binaries released by the > > code producers. > > Again, nothing is stripped gratuitously. If it's not > free software, it can't > be included. > > -- > Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx > <http://mattdm.org/> > Boston University Linux ------> > <http://linux.bu.edu/> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:45:03 +1000 (EST) > From: "Res" <res@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: > > <34657.192.168.0.150.1176173103.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > > On Tue, April 10, 2007 12:41 pm, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:18:30PM +1000, Res > wrote: > >> > That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally > include". > >> BS, if the code producers have a complete package > and fedora decide > >> they > >> dont want to or cant for their own internal > policy reasons include a > >> part > >> of it, thats STRIPPED, it is STRIPPED code that > IS in the > >> correct/real/publicly available TRUE source and > binaries released by the > >> code producers. > > > > Again, nothing is stripped gratuitously. If it's > not free software, it > > can't > > be included. > > > > but it is stripped, as it is not the same code as > released by OOo > > > > > -- > > Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx > <http://mattdm.org/> > > Boston University Linux ------> > <http://linux.bu.edu/> > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > -- > Regards, > Res > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 22:48:22 -0400 > From: linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <200704092248.22578.linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Monday 09 April 2007, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:46:25PM -0400, > linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > No it has something to do with the function not > being > > > open source or something like that. It was on > another > > > mailing > > > > That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally > include". > > It is stripped because it was there from the source. > Can't > legally include is just their opinion. > > The cool thing is I can override their opinion and > put it > back the way the developers provided it for all to > use as > we decide too. > > -- > If the word following begins with > a vowel, the word you want is... > to read the rest of this, go here > http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/a.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:52:23 +0800 > From: Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <461AFBE7.2020203@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Monday 09 April 2007, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:46:25PM -0400, > > linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >>> No it has something to do with the function not > being > >>> open source or something like that. It was on > another > >>> mailing > >> That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally > include". > > > > It is stripped because it was there from the > source. Can't > > legally include is just their opinion. > > Please point me to the source on the OpenOffice > website. I can't seem to > find it. > > > The cool thing is I can override their opinion and > put it > > back the way the developers provided it for all to > use as > > we decide too. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:56:11 +0800 > From: Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <461AFCCB.8030307@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Res wrote: > > On Tue, April 10, 2007 12:41 pm, Matthew Miller > wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:18:30PM +1000, Res > wrote: > >>>> That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally > include". > >>> BS, if the code producers have a complete > package and fedora decide > >>> they > >>> dont want to or cant for their own internal > policy reasons include a > >>> part > >>> of it, thats STRIPPED, it is STRIPPED code that > IS in the > >>> correct/real/publicly available TRUE source and > binaries released by the > >>> code producers. > >> Again, nothing is stripped gratuitously. If it's > not free software, it > >> can't > >> be included. > >> > > > > but it is stripped, as it is not the same code as > released by OOo > > Fine, use "stripped", use "removed", use "altered". > It makes no difference > other than what the writer intends (or > unintentionally) to imply. > > Yes, portions of the original OpenOffice are (insert > choice word here) due > to licensing and or other restrictions either > expressly noted by OpenOffice > and/or its contributors or decided by the Fedora > packagers to avoid > potential litigation. > > Should you not like it, you are free to download the > original rpm's from > OpenOffice.org. FWIW, I can't find it...and nobody > has pointed to the > original srpm from OpenOffice.org. > > So, what is the BFD? > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:09:14 +1000 (EST) > From: "Res" <res@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: > > <34815.192.168.0.10.1176174554.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > On Tue, April 10, 2007 12:48 pm, > linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Monday 09 April 2007, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:46:25PM -0400, > > linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> > No it has something to do with the function not > being > >> > open source or something like that. It was on > another > >> > mailing > >> > >> That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally > include". > > > > It is stripped because it was there from the > source. Can't > > legally include is just their opinion. > Exactly, and yet another nail in fedoras coffin > > The cool thing is I can override their opinion and > put it > > back the way the developers provided it for all to > use as > > we decide too. > Yes, and time to consider other versions of Linux > that dont mutilate :) or > maybe I'll just stick to solaris at home > > -- > > If the word following begins with > > a vowel, the word you want is... > > to read the rest of this, go here > > http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/a.html > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > -- > Regards, > Res > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 22:10:03 -0500 > From: "Arthur Pemberton" <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > > <16de708d0704092010m3343b122m634c2e9062c9e514@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; > format=flowed > > On 4/9/07, linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx > <linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Monday 09 April 2007, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > > On 4/9/07, linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx > > <linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Monday 09 April 2007, Arthur Pemberton > wrote: > > > > > On 4/9/07, linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > <linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > I just learned that Fedora stripped some > > > > > > functionality from OOo. That really sucks > because > > > > > > the functionality they stripped I needed > on one of > > > > > > my projects. That caused the project to > take much > > > > > > longer than it should have. > > > > > > > > > > What stuff is that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Fedora Core 6 and proud > > > > > > > > The drag copy function that will > auto-increment the > > > > data in the cell whether it is text or > numbers. > > > > > > > > Type January or Monday or something like this > > > > b001c001v001 in the cell and then drag. This > doesn't > > > > work with the Fedora version. > > > > > > I tried it on Fedora Core 6, it almost worked, > but wanted > > > and end value, and didn't accept Friday. Could > it just > > > be, as the Fedora version is 2.0? > > > > > > -- > > > Fedora Core 6 and proud > > > > No it has something to do with the function not > being open > > source or something like that. It was on another > mailing > > list. It was also there in OOo 1.1.2 on Knoppix > 3.6 which I > > just tested from the Live CD. > > > Would be nice if you provide a link. I'm unsure as > to what to google for. > > -- > Fedora Core 6 and proud > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 22:18:53 -0500 > From: "Arthur Pemberton" <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > > <16de708d0704092018u5911bea6nda07c07f07880e07@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; > format=flowed > > On 4/9/07, Res <res@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, April 10, 2007 12:48 pm, > linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > On Monday 09 April 2007, Matthew Miller wrote: > > >> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:46:25PM -0400, > > > linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > >> > No it has something to do with the function > not being > > >> > open source or something like that. It was on > another > > >> > mailing > > >> > > >> That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally > include". > > > > > > It is stripped because it was there from the > source. Can't > > > legally include is just their opinion. > > Exactly, and yet another nail in fedoras coffin > > You can't possibly be putting nails in Fedora's > coffin for following the law. > > Are you the same guy bitching every time Fedora is > caught following > safe legal practicies? > > > > > The cool thing is I can override their opinion > and put it > > > back the way the developers provided it for all > to use as > > > we decide too. > > Yes, and time to consider other versions of Linux > that dont mutilate :) or > > maybe I'll just stick to solaris at home > > > -- > > > If the word following begins with > > > a vowel, the word you want is... > > > to read the rest of this, go here > > > http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/a.html > > > > > > -- > > > fedora-list mailing list > > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Res > > > -- > Fedora Core 6 and proud > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 23:20:47 -0400 > From: linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <200704092320.47598.linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Monday 09 April 2007, Ed Greshko wrote: > > linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > On Monday 09 April 2007, Matthew Miller wrote: > > >> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:46:25PM -0400, > > > > > > linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > >>> No it has something to do with the function > not being > > >>> open source or something like that. It was on > another > > >>> mailing > > >> > > >> That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally > include". > > > > > > It is stripped because it was there from the > source. > > > Can't legally include is just their opinion. > > > > Please point me to the source on the OpenOffice > website. > > I can't seem to find it. > > > > > The cool thing is I can override their opinion > and put > > > it back the way the developers provided it for > all to > > > use as we decide too. > > The OpenOffice.org package on the web site will do > things > that can't be done in the Fedora version. Even as > early as > the 1.0.3 version (I have a copy on Knoppix 3.3 live > CD) > from the OOo site had this function in it. > > -- > If the word following begins with > a vowel, the word you want is... > to read the rest of this, go here > http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/a.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:28:35 +0800 > From: Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <461B0463.7020300@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Monday 09 April 2007, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >>> On Monday 09 April 2007, Matthew Miller wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:46:25PM -0400, > >>> linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >>>>> No it has something to do with the function > not being > >>>>> open source or something like that. It was on > another > >>>>> mailing > >>>> That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally > include". > >>> It is stripped because it was there from the > source. > >>> Can't legally include is just their opinion. > >> Please point me to the source on the OpenOffice > website. > >> I can't seem to find it. > >> > >>> The cool thing is I can override their opinion > and put > >>> it back the way the developers provided it for > all to > >>> use as we decide too. > > > > The OpenOffice.org package on the web site will do > things > > that can't be done in the Fedora version. Even as > early as > > the 1.0.3 version (I have a copy on Knoppix 3.3 > live CD) > > from the OOo site had this function in it. > > You didn't answer the question. What you are saying > is not in dispute. > > Please point me to the *source* on the OpenOffice > website (preferably in > srpm format, but tar.gz will be fine) to download. > > > -- > I'll pretend to trust you if you'll pretend to trust > me. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:29:50 -0700 > From: Peter Gordon <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1176175790.3431.1.camel@tuxhugs> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 22:48 -0400, > linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > It is stripped because it was there from the > source. Can't > > legally include is just their opinion. > "Can't legally include" is the determination of the > software by Red > Hat's legal team. When it comes to things of this > nature, I for one > trust them and value their opinion quite a great > deal. > > > The cool thing is I can override their opinion and > put it > > back the way the developers provided it for all to > use as > > we decide too. > Great, but if you redistribute that be prepared for > potential legal > troubles... > -- > Peter Gordon (codergeek42) / FSF & EFF Member > GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: > DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 > Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/ > About: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PeterGordon > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part > Url : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20070409/61dff422/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:32:12 -0700 > From: Peter Gordon <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1176175932.3431.4.camel@tuxhugs> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 23:20 -0400, > linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > The OpenOffice.org package on the web site will do > things > > that can't be done in the Fedora version. Even as > early as > > the 1.0.3 version (I have a copy on Knoppix 3.3 > live CD) > > from the OOo site had this function in it. > > > You have yet to tell us what these missing features > are, or indeed what > to Google for. I, for one, would be interested to > know what I as a user > of this software am potentially missing. > > Thanks. > -- > Peter Gordon (codergeek42) / FSF & EFF Member > GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: > DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 > Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/ > About: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PeterGordon > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part > Url : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20070409/3de8aa3f/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 18 > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 23:32:10 -0400 > From: linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck > To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <200704092332.10912.linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Monday 09 April 2007, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > On 4/9/07, linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx > <linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Monday 09 April 2007, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > > > On 4/9/07, linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > <linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Monday 09 April 2007, Arthur Pemberton > wrote: > > > > > > On 4/9/07, linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > <linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > I just learned that Fedora stripped some > > > > > > > functionality from OOo. That really > sucks > > > > > > > because the functionality they stripped > I > > > > > > > needed on one of my projects. That > caused the > > > > > > > project to take much longer than it > should > > > > > > > have. > > > > > > > > > > > > What stuff is that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Fedora Core 6 and proud > > > > > > > > > > The drag copy function that will > auto-increment the > > > > > data in the cell whether it is text or > numbers. > > > > > > > > > > Type January or Monday or something like > this > > > > > b001c001v001 in the cell and then drag. > This > > > > > doesn't work with the Fedora version. > > > > > > > > I tried it on Fedora Core 6, it almost worked, > but > > > > wanted and end value, and didn't accept > Friday. Could > > > > it just be, as the Fedora version is 2.0? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Fedora Core 6 and proud > > > > > > No it has something to do with the function not > being > > > open source or something like that. It was on > another > > > mailing list. It was also there in OOo 1.1.2 on > Knoppix > > > 3.6 which I just tested from the Live CD. > > > > Would be nice if you provide a link. I'm unsure as > to > > what to google for. > > I just downloaded and installed a copy from the > openoffice.org site and the function that I have > described > is there and works very clean. You type something > that has > a pattern into one cell grab the bottom right corner > drag > down or to the right and the pattern gets dumped > into the > cells. No dialog box, no formula, nothing > complicated, it > just works. > > I don't know what code is in the original package > from OOo > that the Fedora/RH team thinks is questionable. I > just > know it works. I would have like to have known > about it > several months ago. A project I was working on > would have > been a lot easier and faster to do with that > functionality > was in the Fedora version. I do know now and from > now on I > will not install the Fedora version, I will install > the > original version from OOo. > > -- > If the word following begins with > a vowel, the word you want is... > to read the rest of this, go here > http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/a.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 38, Issue 64 > ******************************************* > ____________________________________________________________________________________ It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
