Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 22:48 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> It is stripped because it was there from the source. Can't 
> legally include is just their opinion.
"Can't legally include" is the determination of the software by Red
Hat's legal team. When it comes to things of this nature, I for one
trust them and value their opinion quite a great deal. 

> The cool thing is I can override their opinion and put it 
> back the way the developers provided it for all to use as 
> we decide too.
Great, but if you redistribute that be prepared for potential legal
Peter Gordon (codergeek42) / FSF & EFF Member
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux