Res wrote: > On Tue, April 10, 2007 11:05 am, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:46:25PM -0400, linuxmaillists@xxxxxxxxxxx >> wrote: >>> No it has something to do with the function not being open >>> source or something like that. It was on another mailing >> That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally include". >> >> > > BS, if the code producers have a complete package and fedora decide they > dont want to or cant for their own internal policy reasons include a part > of it, thats STRIPPED, it is STRIPPED code that IS in the > correct/real/publicly available TRUE source and binaries released by the > code producers. Can you point us to the srpm available on openoffice.org website?
