On Friday 23 March 2007, Michael Schwendt wrote: >On 23/03/07, Gene Heskett wrote: >> >> The additional problem is that I need double-size display. >> >> Selecting that gives me double-size, but the window doesn't resize, >> >> and nor does it allow manual re-sizing, so I can only see one >> >> quarter of the display. >> > >> >Works fine here. Desktop environment is GNOME. >> >> It isn't working for dbl-size in kde, the window itself is not >> expanded. And the playlist is not effected. The selector window is I >> believe, but not the on-screen playlist. > >The playlist font size can be configured easily in the preferences. >That doesn't get rid of the fixed size buttons at the bottom of the >playlist window, though. Perhaps the old winamp-style design is too >much of a burden for the developers. Whatever the reason is, those microscopic images are unreadable on a 1600x1200 screen. So you wind up clicking an icon for effect and canceling if it wasn't what you wanted. Surely the developers must at some time use a screen that's more than 640x400 and see how teeny these things are? Or do they think folks running more than 800x600 are the very elite few? There's nothing 'elite' about me, I put my pants on one leg at a time just like the rest of the world. But my screen runs at 1600x1200. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) <zarkov> "NT 5.0. All the bugs and ten times the code size!"
