Olaf Mueller wrote: > I am wondering where are all the updates remain for fc6. Is fc6 bad > supported although fc7 is not released? I'm not sure why you'd think that. There are plenty of updates being pushed for fc6 still. > The packages I am missing updates for are: > koffice* I didn't feel like looking for this in bugzilla, but I'd bet it wouldn't take long to check. > clamav-server-sysv > clamav-lib > clamav-update > clamav-milter-sysv > clamav > clamav-server > clamav-data > clamav-milter See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229202 . > htdig (current fc6 version is not usable) Is there a bugzilla entry about whatever problem you have with htdig? > It is funny cause there are already new clamav-* (0.90) packages for > fc7 See the bug above. > But fc7 is not released and nobody of redhat or fedora core > like to support fc6 any more, seems to me. But is not fc6 the version > users are working with at the moment? > Now, I am at the point I do not understand fedora any more. > Ok, I get it. Fedora Core is only a playground, nothing more, nothing > stable, nothing with a long lifespan. > It is frustrating. Ok, I get it. Ask a question, answer it yourself, make a mountain out of a mole hill. What sort of response would you expect from the above? -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ====================================================================== The problem is not that the world is full of fools. The problem is that lightning isn't being distributed right. -- Mark Twain
Attachment:
pgpbKQTpeH1bC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
