Re: More on swap.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 12:36 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > 
> > Well this is an interesting article but it tells one nothing about swap
> > fits into the virtual memory structure for the 2.4 kernel in this case.
> 
> No, but it does cover the "overcommit" feature of the Linux VM. 
> Understanding overcommit and the requirements of fork() in a posix 
> environment are critical to deciding how much swap you need.
The only point I am trying to make is that strictly speaking in a VM
system when the memory gets full segments (or pages) from memory are
sent back to the disk (in the place on the disk where they come from).
The swap area has a system of indexing the pages it contains that allows
the system to retrieve segments (or pages) from the swap area faster
than they can be retrieved from the regular disk partition. What Unix
(and Linux) introduced is a algorithm to decide under what circumstances
the strict requirements of a VM system would be violated and segments
(or pages) would be temporarily placed in the swap space rather than
back into their original position on the disk. Unless you know under
which circumstances this occurs you can't really evaluate your need for
swap space.
> 
> Generally, the overcommit feature may allow some things to work better, 
> but introduces some serious problems when the assumptions behind 
> overcommit don't apply.  Hence, it's off by default.  If you're not 
> using overcommit, then you should have considerably more swap than you 
> intend to actually use.  Swapping is slow, and many people prefer to 
> have very little because they believe that if they allow memory use to 
> grow that large, the system will be very slow to respond.  In some cases 
> they are right.  However, if you have insufficient swap, the login 
> processes may not be able to fork, and you may not be able to log in and 
> correct the problem.  Larger applications may be unable to fork, and use 
> external helpers, even when there appears to be sufficient memory for 
> the helpers.
> 
> I'm of the opinion that it's best to have plenty of swap, as previously 
> discussed.
> 
--
=======================================================================
A penny saved kills your career in government.
=======================================================================
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux