Re: videolan

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: videolan
From: "Paulo Cavalcanti" <promac@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:20:11 -0200
In-reply-to: <45CCE89C.1040607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <45CCD13F.3000203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fae19b3b0702091229i36ac8366r8e5699585656e692@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45CCE89C.1040607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

When you know a lot about the package you want to install, you can go
straight and use some strong arguments like "nodeps" or "force" but when
you don't know much.... you give up.

I give up untill the compatibility between what I have installed and
what I want to install become better....

Thanks anyway.

Try this one:

http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/fedora/linux/6/vlc/vlc-0.8.6a-1.fc6.i386.rpm

--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ

Follow-Ups:
- Re: videolan
  - From: François Patte

References:
- videolan
  - From: François Patte
- Re: videolan
  - From: Laurent Vaills
- Re: videolan
  - From: François Patte

Prev by Date: Re: S/Mime signing [WAS: gecko-libs dependency]
Next by Date: Re: Livna repo broken?
Previous by thread: Re: videolan
Next by thread: Re: videolan
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]