Hi, > > I think you mean 4Gb of HD space and not RAM. Hell, my main box here is > > an x86_64 beast of a machine and that only has 1.5Gb of RAM > What I mean is that according to this list and other resources, x86_64 > has a few more problems then i386 due to (mostly) closed source 32-bit > only programs and drivers and (in some cases) programs assuming 32-bit > where now there is 64. And the primary advantage of running native > 64-bit is that a process can address much more memory. So unless you > need that extra memory addressing you might want to run 32-bit. Tell > me, why are you running 64-bit? I bought a board and processor incredibly cheaply. They're 64 bit, so I run the 64 bit version. I don't run any closed source 32 bit stuff. Infact, I don't run anything that's closed source. -- "Mmmmmmmm....Shakira geschmiert mit schokolade" sagt Homer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
