You didn't state what isn't performing to your expectations, However you're using a fairly low end GPU, so there isn't much that can be done to improve its performance other than to not use Composite (which by nature will result in a performance hit). On 1/24/07, Srikanth Konjarla <srikanth.konjarla@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So, the GPU that my laptop has performing as expected. In this case, how do i improve the performance? As this GPU shares the main memory, would increasing the system memory help? On 1/24/07, Lonni J Friedman <netllama@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As long as the CPU usage isn't consistantly 100%, then this sounds > like expected behavior on the GPU you're using. > > On 1/24/07, Srikanth Konjarla <srikanth.konjarla@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > i run "top" and review the "%CPU" field. > > > > On 1/24/07, Lonni J Friedman <netllama@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > How are you determining that X is consuming alot of CPU? > > > > > > On 1/24/07, Srikanth Konjarla <srikanth.konjarla@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > It is not consistently 100% (i mean does not stay at 100%) for sure. > > > > It goes higher with Beryl. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/24/07, Lonni J Friedman <netllama@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > How are you determining that X is consuming alot of CPU? Is it > > > > > consistantly 100% or just higher than without beryl? > > > > > > > > > > On 1/24/07, Srikanth Konjarla <srikanth.konjarla@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Without Beryl, X server is usually hovering around 5% of cpu (spikes > > > > > > when firefox or thunderbird activity happens) but with Beryl running > > > > > > it consumes lot of CPU (up to 100%). I am running > > > > > > beryl-core-0.1.4-2.fc6.x86_64. Also, i have attached the X log file > > > > > > (Xorg.0.log.gz) with Beryl running. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > Srikanth > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/24/07, Lonni J Friedman <netllama@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > On 1/24/07, Srikanth Konjarla <srikanth.konjarla@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry about that. I have attached the X log file to this e-mail. Please > > > > > > > > note that currently Beryl is disabled. Let me know if you like to see X > > > > > > > > log file with Beryl enabled. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Srikanth > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lonni J Friedman wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 1/24/07, Srikanth Konjarla <srikanth.konjarla@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> I have recently updated nVidia driver (livna rpm x86_64 Kernel Module > > > > > > > > >> 1.0-9746 , Dual Core AMD X2) on FC6 hoping to see some improvement in > > > > > > > > >> performance with Beryl. But, unfortunately i could not find any > > > > > > > > >> improvements in that area. I have been running into the issue where Xorg > > > > > > > > >> would go nuts with CPU when Beryl is running. So, i have disabled the > > > > > > > > >> Beryl. Here is what lspci tells me about my graphics card. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> 00:05.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation C51 PCI Express > > > > > > > > >> Bridge (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA]) > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Wondering if the issue is purely related to nVidia's driver (C51 PCI > > > > > > > > >> Express Bridge) or it is the combination of Beryl and nVidia. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is Xorg hitting the CPU immediately, or over time? Posting your X log > > > > > > > > > would be useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ideally, I'd like to see an X log while the problem is present. > > > > > > > However, are you seeing an actual performance problem, or is it just > > > > > > > that X is using 100% of the CPU while running beryl? Also, which > > > > > > > version of beryl are you using?
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ L. Friedman netllama@xxxxxxxxx LlamaLand http://netllama.linux-sxs.org
