-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 17:34 -0800, David Boles wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Christopher A. Williams wrote: >>> On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 16:55 -0800, David Boles wrote: >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> Christopher A. Williams wrote: >>> <snip...> >>>>> I've written to all of them before - including Citibank (citicards was >>>>> mentioned in a separate answer on this thread). I got no response from >>>>> CNN or Fox. >>>>> >>>>> Ironically, I was shopping for a credit card when I ran into Citibank's >>>>> website issues. I told them that I would not apply for a credit card >>>>> from them if their Website wouldn't support my choice of Web browser. >>>>> Their response: An on-line application form by e-mail pointing to their >>>>> website. Nice...! >>>>> >>>>> I actually had one Website administrator (http://www.petharbor.com) tell >>>>> me that IE6 was the only "authorized" browser for viewing their site. I >>>>> told them that, as a site promoting a public service relied upon by city >>>>> governments, it was not their place to say which browsers were >>>>> "authorized". I got no further response. I also don't use them anymore - >>>>> I guess they have enough assistance from "authorized" browser running >>>>> people who don't mind frame based sites. >>>>> >>>>> Even if it's only in a small way, I vote with my wallet when this stuff >>>>> happens. Capital One has a site that works just fine. So does American >>>>> Express. Citibank is not the only credit card company in town, and I >>>>> figure that if they won't listen to me about this when it comes to >>>>> customer service, they probably also won't listen to me about other >>>>> issues if they were to come up as well... >>>>> >>>>> Anyone from Citibank care to comment?? >>>> I am NOT from Citibank. >>>> >>>> But you never said what was your preferred browser. >>> Wow! I re-read that a couple of times and you're right!! On Linux, I >>> tend to prefer Firefox. I'll use Konqueror as well when it suits what I >>> need or feel like a change. >>> >>> Incidentally, none of the above sites worked very well for me using >>> Konqueror either. I have the Greasemonkey extension for Firefox working >>> with Fox News now. For some reason, Konqueror still isn't working with >>> Fox. >> First? You kinda' highjacked his thread with you Citibank problem. You should >> have started a one. Not a big deal. That happens here often. ;-) > It is hard to highjack a thread that you started. The topic as I saw it > was sites that could not be reached properly with firefox. Just for > accuracy. www.citicards.com is the cite that can't be accessed. I can. Rawhide soon to be FC& and Firefox 2.0.0.1. No cpmplaint from the site at all. They want you to have Flash 9 but all that does is give you the ads. - -- David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFFtNNlAO0wNI1X4QERAtvQAKCy9Yr1kuyv/oEkr7L8673FmdubOgCeOPb2 86yjagnhLSa1nW0MjV6BC8M= =y/YR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
