Re: Package updater broke?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John Bowden wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 01:44 +0000, John Bowden wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 20:32 -0500, Jim Cornette wrote:
John Bowden wrote:
Hi List.
I have been off line for nearly two weeks due to my broad band
connection failing. As soon as I got my connection up I went to the
Software updater to check for any up dates and as expected it gave me a
long list. First I selected all the packages but kept getting error
messages complaining about unresolved dependencies. I then selected each
package one at a time and get the same unresolved dependencies message
for each package (I have tried the first 12 packages so far). I thought
the package updater was supposed to sort out the dependencies
automatically? Any ideas whats wrong?
john


You might try to open a root terminal and run yum clean all. Maybe there are old headers left over since the time you last updated that it is using as reference to packages.

After cleaning up the headers, you might as well try running yum update from the CLI since you are already there. You will probably get more descriptive error outputs from the output of yum if it still fails.

Jim

--
If you don't have time to do it right, where are you going to find the time
to do it over?

After posting my last email I had a quick look at "man yum" and then
tried yum update after su-ing. It did update most but failed on a lot of
others. will try your clean all command


That seems to have worked much better. Just two error messages:-

http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/development/i386/wine-docs-0.9.27-1.fc7.noarch.rpm: [Errno 12] Timeout: <urlopen error timed out>
Trying other mirror.
Error: failure: wine-docs-0.9.27-1.fc7.noarch.rpm from
extras-development: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
[root@localhost led]#
I'm guessing these are caused by these sites being down, hopefully
temporarily, so I will leave it for now and have another go later on
today when I get up. Thanks for your help
Regards John



You might try excluding the wine packages with --exclude="wine*" added to yum update to get the other packages installed. Then you might need to check your wine packages to see if there is two versions of one package in the group of wine related packages. You might have some package where version-old and version-new are both in the rpm database. I guess it might be possible that extras and core are hitting different mirrors that are out of sync at the same time the transaction is being performed. An alternative would be to run 'yum update "wine*"' adding the -y switch for yes is what I do but I thought I'd leave the choice to the user. Then after wine upgrades its set of rpms that it requires, you can try the other upgrades in pieces like "[a-f]*" or similar incremental steps. I don't think it will be needed to do incremental steps but thought that I'd add the option as a possible choice.

Jim

--
A man is not complete until he is married -- then he is finished.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux