On Monday 08 January 2007 13:48, Tim wrote: > Tim: > >> Too much like that disastrous re-arrange your mess of the start menu on > >> Windows (which wouldn't be needed if the thing was organised, in the > >> first place). > > Anne Wilson: > > I certainly wouldn't quote fedora's menu, at least under kde, as a > > good example. > > Me either, though the Gnome one's not too bad. Apart from the STUPID > generic naming of some items, instead of naming the particular item. > > e.g. Internet Messenger instead of Gaim instant messenger. > Or Audio Player, instead of XMMS audio player (I've got more > than one audio player). > An so on... > > > As for the windows one, I've often rearranged it and never had it > > revert. > > Sounds like they get rid of that disaster for XP then. But to replace > it, by default, with a whacking huge panel where people can't find what > they want. It never happened to me in any of the versions I've used, from 3.1 to XP. I dislike the XP one, as you do, but when I have to use XP I change most such things to Classic style. I don't recall whether the main menu can be done that way, though. Still, we are drifting way off topic. Anne
Attachment:
pgpp7sYxSDhdR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
