Re: Missing define?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21 Dec 2006 at 16:34, James Wilkinson wrote:

> Larry Phillips wrote:
> 
> > Sounds good. I went to the Ditribution page at fedora.redhat, and
> > found a couple of Canadian distributors. Right now I am trying to
> > figure out which distribution I need. I see 1386, x86, x86_64, and
> > i686 all spoken of, and the vendors I have found so far seem to only
> > carry i386 and x86_64. Will the i386 distribution do for a 486 or
> > Pentium machine?
> 
> Firstly, no Fedora release works on a 486.

Oh! I thought I had a 486 om my Dell machine. I guess it can't be, because Fedora Core 3 is happily running on it. Unfortunately I 
can't confirm this, because I have no idea how to query the processor type from the OS, and it doesn't seem to want to stop at the 
BIOS when I hit F10 on power-up.

> Secondly, these days i386 and x86 are effectively the same thing -- the
> 32 bit architecture introduced with the Intel 386. i686 includes all the
> (few) extra instructions added by the Pentium Pro -- so that also
> includes Pentium II, AMD Athlon (or later) or recent VIA processors.
> 
> Fedora i386 includes support for i586 processors if you happen to have
> an older PC. There isn't a separate i686 release -- Fedora i386 also
> supports these processors.

Glad to hear it! I ordered a Core 6 i386 CD set, after scratching around a little, and deciding it must have been an 1386 version I 
installed Core 3 with.

> Hope this helps,

It does. Thanks a bunch.

Larry
--
O Sibili, Si. Ergo Fortibus es in ero.
O Nobili! Deis Trux. Vatis inem? Causen Dux!


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux