Re: ****Re: Yum public keys -

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Craig White wrote:
> I think that you have every reason to expect dries/matthias/dag/aka
> rpmforge packages to be fully compatible with fedora
> core/extras/updates packages. There is overlap between the rpmforge
> packages and livna and typically the the rpmforge packages are newer
> than the livna packages which can sometimes present a problem when
> you have libraries from livna installed as opposed to coming from
> extras and a newer version of the requiring package in an rpmforge
> repo.

That does seem reasonable and likely works in most cases.  I used
FreshRPMS on one of my FC4 systems and it worked well.  I'm not sure
where the problem arose in Bob's case, though it appears to be a case
of one of the rpmforge repos providing a package that is already in
extras.

- -- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
======================================================================
There is nothing government can give you that it hasn't taken from you
in the first place.
    -- Winston Churchill

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iQFDBAEBAgAtBQJFXdUJJhhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnBvYm94LmNvbS9+dG16L3BncC90
bXouYXNjAAoJEEMlk4u+rwzjkboH/0uFDhNbjU5irbN2e46JiTn8SSZXSoLUHXk+
taj6LfKD+o7AgNFAmOn/2SS6GcpC7hKHdb3A9O86xlAXEToBnKbDkgPYDaBg8/Jk
u5VEB7CnVuF74UeG1DaH2/WUsSc+8UG9xRSxuUCKlF78Vq5Pt1JSdK8G+dKf7vWO
dtky+Rt9Ojel+76GBNHQtQ1uEyMpS7aykB5aj807kjzdM1309/+8xnal0fjJ0MXK
ozcTPswZ+Rz7jOCmf1GY18CRaZJg9Y4dGrvKsRIBNM1Ce36PdzyBgmJE7AARzZfo
JaV46iyvFLiBFiw2w0OaSKNwsux3C7ixP7Qcdg91U8MPgrkMAGo=
=2aPT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux