On Sunday 12 November 2006 16:57, Tony Nelson wrote: >At 12:36 PM -0500 11/12/06, Gene Heskett wrote: >>On Sunday 12 November 2006 12:24, Tony Nelson wrote: >>>At 2:54 PM +1030 11/12/06, Tim wrote: >>>>On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 08:38 -0700, David G. Miller wrote: >>>>> The only problem with info based documentation is info. >>>> >>>>Yes, I could go along with that. Probably even worse than lynx. >>>> >>>>> Try pinfo instead. Much nicer UI. >>>> >>>>Tried that before, about the only difference I could see was >>>>colourisation of the output. It was still a bastard to navigate >>>>through. >>> >>>"Me too!". I'd like to see some substantive description of the >>> benefits of using pinfo, to find out if they outweigh the horrible >>> illegibility of pinfo's display. Probably all I'll get is more of >>> "Pinfo's display is perfectly legible. What's wrong with you?" >>> >>>The essential info commands are pressing spacebar or page down to go >>> down, pressing page up to go up, pressing return when the insertion >>> point is in a link to go elsewhere, pressing l (ell) to go back, and >>> pressing q to quit. -- >> >>I don't know about the spacebar, but page-up-down do nothing here. > >Does it work in a terminal window to scroll through your command > history? Yes, perfectly Thanks. -- Cheers, Gene
