On Sun, 12/11/06, Andre Costa wrote: > On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:01:10 +0000 > Leo <sdl.web@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Sat, 11/11/06, John Mahowald wrote: >> >> > I added it to the Extras wish list. [1] The list is long, however. >> > If you can find an interested packager, or package the rpm >> > yourself, it can go up for review. >> > >> > If you have not already I would encourage you to look at the artwork >> > project. [2] >> > >> > John >> > >> > [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/WishList >> > [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork >> >> I can be the packager. > > That's cool, murrine is one of the finest looking themes out there. I've > been missing it on FC6 since I upgraded from FC5. > > Leo: I tried your spec file, and murrine RPM was generated just fine. > However, something is wrong, because trying to use it yields wrong look > & feel (it looks like boring GTK default as if no L&F had been > applied). Can anyone confirm this? Murrine has an incompatible update from 0.2.x to 0.3.x. You probably is using a theme that hasn't been upgraded to use the latest Murrine engine. As requested by Máirín Duffy, I have added three themes to the RPMs. I also have submitted FC5 and FC6 rpms to Cimi. > > Anyway, IMHO murrine is very welcome on Fedora-land. Thks to Andrea and > Leo for the initiative =) > > Regards, > > Andre > > -- > Andre Oliveira da Costa -- Leo
