On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 13:39 +0000, Simon Andrews wrote: > Just as a thought - why is nocddma not made the default in the install > kernel (ie the one used during install rather than the one which is > actually installed). Are there any downsides to this? Possibly that drive speed will be a lot slower. It's not much fun trying to do just a basic install that takes about two hours. > It would save a lot of these explanatory messages after every > release... DMA actually working would be more preferable. This problem has been around for quite some time. -- (Currently running FC4, in case that's important to the thread) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
