Re: NVidia from Livna seems to have broken X

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: NVidia from Livna seems to have broken X
• From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: 31 Oct 2006 09:06:43 -0600
• In-reply-to: <4547274B.9010003@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <200610290923.28814.claude_jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <pan.2006.10.31.09.42.11.801017@xxxxxxxxx> <4547274B.9010003@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4

>>>>> "TL" == Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

TL> Is it that bad that we (livna developers) should integrate that
TL> into the package? Anyone interested in doing that?

I recall seeing a patch on the nvnews.net forum that obviated the need
to remove the module.

But this is only an issue with the 9xxx beta drivers; I didn't think
Livna shipped those in any case.

 - J<

• References:
  • NVidia from Livna seems to have broken X
    • From: Claude Jones
  • Re: NVidia from Livna seems to have broken X
    • From: Roo
  • Re: NVidia from Livna seems to have broken X
    • From: Thorsten Leemhuis

• Prev by Date: Re: OT: a problem about text manipulation
• Next by Date: Re: yum prob on lappy
• Previous by thread: Re: NVidia from Livna seems to have broken X
• Next by thread: Re: NVidia from Livna seems to have broken X
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread