On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 10:13 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: > > > > Yet we all have to endure your although very secure 19 line text > > siganture... > > > > ;-) > > Do you mean the gpg signature? If so, yes. Unlike html this is a security > feature not a liability. How much of a feature is having your mail program do some extra work to report this - on the message I'm replying to: The signature of this message cannot be verified, it may have been altered in transit. gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) gpg: Signature made Fri 29 Sep 2006 04:13:56 AM CDT using DSA key ID BFE7357F gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found It doesn't give me any warm fuzzies... -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
