On Friday 29 September 2006 09:09, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: > On 9/29/06, Todd Zullinger <tmz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > before viewing. I never miss seeing someone's large red font or > > graphical .sig. > > Yet we all have to endure your although very secure 19 line text > siganture... > > ;-) Do you mean the gpg signature? If so, yes. Unlike html this is a security feature not a liability. > > Honestly, all the html email haters need to get over it, it's not 1991 > any more, we have hard drive space, we have fast cpu's, and we dont > have to keep every email we recieve (thank the spamers for that > revelation!) > > I get what your saying, ugly fonts and weird colours and dancing > monkeys, but it's not worth moaning about. Delete is your friend... > You prefer html - that is your privilege. However many of us prefer not to. More important is the fact that most mailing lists specifically ask you *not* to use html. Do as you like for private mail, but please respect the wishes of mailing lists. Anne
Attachment:
pgpKruRLKBOcb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
