Thufir wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:39:39 -0700, Scott wrote:
[...]
And if I had to make a choice, I'd pick Ubuntu myself. I prefer APT over
YUM. YUM has some good features but the slowness of it drives me nuts.
I also like seing my downloads in the console or using the Snaptic GUI
app). YUMEX or KYum don't even come close to Synaptic.
[...]
Why does, to my knowledge, only livna offer an rpm which configures the
livna repository? Other repositories don't seem to offer an RPM for their
respective repository.
-Thufir
I think if Fedora can get yum straightened out, make is faster (it *can*
be done, you know, apt is faster), make it more featureful and stable
and make sure that all rpms conform to one format so that rpms from
different repositories do not conflict, then Fedora would be *much*
improved. BTW, I must also point out that yum is quite improved from its
FC2 days though -- good work there.
->HS
