On 21/09/06, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It claims to be the wrong version, i.e. 2.4.1. I dont believe the original version is anywhere to be found on my system.
Cups also complains about python during boot.
Best regards and thanks!
Alastair
Alastair McKinley wrote:
> On 21/09/06, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Alastair McKinley wrote:
>> > echo $PATH gives:
>> >
>> > /usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin
>> >
>> > So there is no python path.
>>
>> What do you mean?
>>
>> Why couldn't there be a local install of python in /usr/local/bin that
>> could break all of your python apps?
>>
>> What's the output of "which python" run in your regular user account
>> (the one that got python 2.4.1 when you just ran "python")?
>>
>> Paul.
>>
>> --
>> fedora-list mailing list
>> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>>
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> "which python" from both my root and user accounts gives /usr/bin/python.
And if you run /usr/bin/python, which version does it claim to be?
Paul.
--
It claims to be the wrong version, i.e. 2.4.1. I dont believe the original version is anywhere to be found on my system.
Cups also complains about python during boot.
Best regards and thanks!
Alastair
