On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 11:35 -0400, Claude Jones wrote: > There was a transitional time of confusion when the USB spec was being > enhanced. Many devices labeled USB 2 were not. They had perhaps > additional features over the original spec, but they were not faster. > That created a lot of problems - my experience has been exactly what > you describe. I have a Windows suffering friend, that everytime he plugs his allegedly USB 2 VOIP phone into his allegedly USB 2 port (according to all the BIOS settings, and the manual), it complains that the device would run faster in a USB 2 port. Of course, we can't tell if that's just yet another bogus Windows error message, or it should be interpreted literally. Similarly, his external drive cases are USB 2, but they're nearly always recognised as USB 1. -- (Currently running FC4, occasionally trying FC5.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
