Re: FAILED for eth0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/17/06, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But my question persists: should not Fedora automatically update MAC
> addresses? And if it should, should one fill a bug at Bugzilla?

I think it is intended behavior - that is, it goes out of it's way
to not apply an existing configuration to a different NIC that it
detects as the same eth? device regardless of the reason.  Personally
I think that will do the wrong thing more times than right, but
someone worked to make it happen like that.  If you don't like it
you can just edit out the HWADDR line from the file.  Maybe you could
file a feature request to make the GUI have an option to tie the config
to the HWADDR or not.

It can't really know if you swapped the NIC, added a new one that
wasn't supposed to become eth0, removed one and let some other
interface shift up to the eth0 slot, if the kernel detection
order changed (again), or you've restored onto completely different
but matching hardware.  Only in the swap or restore cases could it do
something reasonable automatically.

Thanks, Les and Timothy, for your helpful comments.

Paul


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux