Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
• From: Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:16:04 +0800
• In-reply-to: <1155798557.2518.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <44E21A06.6030208@xxxxxxxxxxx> <44E2629D.4000606@xxxxxxxxxxx> <44E35D58.9030001@xxxxxxxxxxx> <44E3BA8C.6090608@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1155798557.2518.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060719)

Tim wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 08:38 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> I didn't run FC4...but I believe it used up2date. 
> 
> FC3 used up2date, by FC4 it wasn't really usable.  FC4 uses YUM.
> 

OK...they probably went to xorg-x11 by then too, huh?

So, it would be "yum provides libglx.so" and it probably returns
xorg-x11-server-Xorg.

-- 
Argue for your limitations, and sure enough, they're yours.
		-- Messiah's Handbook : Reminders for the Advanced Soul

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
    • From: Tim

• References:
  • glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
    • From: Philip Walden
  • Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
    • From: Ed Greshko
  • Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
    • From: Philip Walden
  • Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
    • From: Ed Greshko
  • Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
    • From: Tim

• Prev by Date: Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
• Next by Date: Re: mouse wheel problems
• Previous by thread: Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
• Next by thread: Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread