Ben Liblit wrote: > Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote: >> You should be including [GPG key checking options] in your cbi.repo >> file: > Aah, right. Good idea. I've updated the handy-dandy CBI repository > configurator (http://www.cs.wisc.edu/cbi/downloads/repo-config.html) > to include those options. Impressively quick response. >> Or better yet, distribute a cbi-release-<version>.rpm file [...] >> Which contains all the necessary configs > Now that is a capital idea. I like it. Done. You can now set up > all the right repository configuration for FC4 or FC5 by installing > one of: > > <http://www.cs.wisc.edu/cbi/downloads/rpm/fedora-4-i386/RPMS.tools/cbi-package-config-4-1.i386.rpm> > > <http://www.cs.wisc.edu/cbi/downloads/rpm/fedora-5-i386/RPMS.tools/cbi-package-config-5-1.i386.rpm> > > > Cool. I should have done that a long time ago. Thanks for the > suggestion, Keith! Such enthusiasm! I don't use Evolution, Gaim, Gnumeric, or Rhythmbox, and I've never even *heard* of Spim, but I'm a big Gnome fan and so obviously I use Nautilus. I've never seen the Gimp crash ever, but I've had Nautilus bomb out on me a couple of times, so I'd be more than happy to contribute CBI reports using your instrumented version. I take it you are superseding core/updates using only release numbers and not Epochs. Epochs are bad. Bad Epochs. >> You're not related to *this* CBI, I take it: >> >> http://www.cbi.org.uk (The Confederation of British Industry). > Nope. Though if they have any bugs, I might be able to help fix > them. :-) British Industry only has one major bug, and it's called TAX. Any chance you could fix *that*? -- K. http://slated.org - Slated, Rated & Blogged Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) on sky, running kernel 2.6.16-1.2133_FC5 20:49:09 up 9 days, 21:05, 2 users, load average: 0.01, 0.00, 0.00
